Unfortunately, I have no real sense of how GIMP works so making it more step-by-step would be far easier to learn from. It did make the assumption that you knew what you were doing with GIMP too. It would have been better if it showed the image being worked on from scratch, transing out the background, editing around the particles, etc. J O E Y T J E 5 0 T A L K pull my finger 12:47, Febru(UTC) The problem with parsons's particle transparencies now is that he makes it look the way he ants to, adding particles to the places he likes instead of the places the original particles were. The guide how to do it right can be found here, but after making that guide Parsons changed his methods to a method that is not allowed by the policy. REDIRECT User:Cqm/Signature 12:06, Febru(UTC).I've also yet to find a guide on how to do it properly, so if anyone has one let me know J O E Y T J E 5 0 T A L K pull my finger 11:55, Febru(UTC) Per below, I do support adding to this policy that recreating particles identical to the original is allowed. I'm guessing that would be rule breaking too, but when you can't tell the difference does it really matter? When I was talking to Fergs about how you do this sort of thing, she said it was done with photoshop editing the picture in layers until the particles look right. Oppose - I've yet to figure out how to trans particle effects like this, this or this, but leaving the areas un-tranlucified makes the image look beyond terrible. J O E Y T J E 5 0 T A L K pull my finger 11:39, Febru(UTC) There is no rule disallowing particle transparency, but there is a rule disallowing creating particles yourself, which is what you did on the File:Mercenary ranger.png image. Strong oppose - You just don't get it do you? The problem with your particle transparencies is that you create the particles yourself, instead of adding transparency to the particles. I wanted to show you how TzHaar-Mej with fake Transparency, this shows what it looks like compared to the normal one, without transparency - User:Parsonsda/Signature 15:21, Febru(UTC) River spirit TzHaar-Mej With Fake Transparency Thanks for your time - User:Parsonsda/Signature 11:27, Febru(UTC) Summery: So in Summery, should we change the rules on "Fan Art" in this case? or shall we leave it, and have more image trans like this? Or shall we Have images with Particles to be like this:Īs it may be a rule, but it now becoming out dated, as it not really fan art, it users trying to help improve the wiki. I wish to change the rules, and i wouldn't say this is fan art, it a way to improve the images on the wiki, as what happens if we have a full particle Monster? then it gonna be horrible, the main plot for adding images on the wiki, is adding them so people know what they are, so changing particles into that won't make much of a change, it just make them look so much nicer, and recently as you know, TzHaar got updated, and as you can see all them images are ruined as we can't fix the transparency, i have been looking at how particle work, and i learn, a particle is 1 image repeated, nothing more, if you look closely at them, you'll see what i mean, like the fire in The Firemaker's Curse it all just 1 image, so what should we do? shall we leave the wiki to have more images like these: Hello, today i come with you with a big topic, it about changing how images work on Runescape Wiki, there all good, but there 1 thing that starting to ruin the wiki, and that is "Particles", the transparency on them is as you know really art, but we can't use other particles to make it work, here a example:Īnd this is the Image i done yesterday, using particles from another image This thread was archived on 24 March 2012 by Urbancowgurl777. Please do not edit the contents of this page.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |